From 076792d13dbc93d374a0bbbb63901c5610278e7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guilhem Moulin Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:07:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Reformulation. --- imapsync.1 | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/imapsync.1 b/imapsync.1 index b86c9e5..d794d1a 100644 --- a/imapsync.1 +++ b/imapsync.1 @@ -306,13 +306,14 @@ Authorities, used for server certificate verification. .IP \[bu] Using \fBimapsync\fR on two identical servers with a non-existent or -empty database will duplicate each message due to absence of +empty database will duplicate each message due to the absence of local/remote UID association. .IP \[bu] \fBimapsync\fR is single threaded and doesn't use IMAP command -pipelining. Performance improvement could be achieved by sending -independent commands to each server in parallel, and for a given server, -by sending independent commands (such as flag updates) in a pipeline. +pipelining. Synchronization could be boosted by sending independent +commands (such as the initial LIST/STATUS command) to each server in +parallel, and for a given server, by sending independent commands (such +as flag updates) in a pipeline. .IP \[bu] Because the IMAP protocol doesn't have a specific response code for when a message is moved to another mailbox (using the MOVE command from -- 2.39.2